Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty-paid inputs used in the manufacture of captively consumed capital goods, which were exempt under Notification No. 67/95-CX. dated 16-3-1995, could be treated as inputs used in the manufacture of the assessee's dutiable final products.
Analysis: The capital goods manufactured from the inputs were themselves a distinct intermediate product and were not the finished goods cleared from the factory. The fact that such capital goods were later used in the manufacture of dutiable final products did not mean that the original inputs had been used directly in the manufacture of those final products. Once transformed into capital goods, the inputs could no longer be regarded as remaining in the same form or as being used as such in the cleared final products.
Conclusion: The claim for treating the inputs as having been used in the manufacture of dutiable final products was rejected, and the appeal failed.