Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under Notification No. 30/97-Cus., the assessee was entitled to replenish coking coal by importing LAM coke after discharge of export obligation.
Analysis: The allowed import entitlement under the import-export policy covered either coking coal or metallurgical coke (LAM coke) as alternative inputs for the relevant export products. The imported LAM coke was covered by a valid licence and the department did not establish violation of the standard input-output norms, diversion of the imported goods, or breach of the notification conditions. The expression relating to replenishment of "such material" was treated as encompassing either of the permitted inputs, and the choice of the more beneficial notification was held to be permissible.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to import LAM coke in replenishment and no violation of Notification No. 30/97-Cus. was made out.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a duty-free scheme permits alternative inputs for the same export obligation, replenishment can be made with any permitted input so long as the import is under a valid licence and there is no breach of the notification conditions or diversion of the goods.