Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit and duty liability could be denied on transfer of an entire division with its capital goods and inputs to another entity without physical removal from the factory.
Analysis: The transfer was of one division as a going concern, together with its machinery, raw material, work-in-progress, consumables and finished goods, and the admitted position was that none of the inputs or capital goods had been physically removed from the factory premises. The provisions relating to removal of inputs or capital goods apply only when there is actual removal from the factory, and the deeming provisions concerning removal could not be extended to a mere sale of the division with continued manufacture in the same premises. Following the prior decisions on the same principle, the Tribunal held that such a transaction did not attract duty on the transferred goods and no consequential penalty could be sustained.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to pay duty on the transferred inputs and capital goods, and penalty was not imposable.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded, and the demand as well as the consequential penalty were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Sale of an entire division without physical removal of inputs or capital goods from the factory does not constitute removal for the purpose of excise duty under the applicable Modvat provisions.