Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit under Rule 57Q was admissible on hot water generator, industrial water heater, computer system, siliminate mortar and zimborne cement used by the assessee in its manufacturing process.
Analysis: The goods were found to have a direct nexus with the manufacture and testing of the final product. The hot water generator and computer system were used for testing thermal quality and heat transfer value, while the industrial water heater supplied heat required for the manufacturing process. Applying the principle that capital goods are to be understood by their functional use in the manufacturing activity, the items qualified for credit. As to siliminate mortar and zimborne cement, even if their eligibility as capital goods was doubtful, they were treated as inputs because they were necessary for the proper running of the furnace and were used in or in relation to manufacture. The absence of a separate claim under Rule 57A did not defeat entitlement where the goods were otherwise eligible and declaration under Rule 57T had been made.
Conclusion: Credit was admissible and the denial of Modvat credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods having functional utility in the manufacturing process, including testing and supporting operations, qualify for Modvat credit as capital goods or inputs where they are used in or in relation to manufacture and the relevant procedural declaration has been made.