Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tools and dies falling under Heading 82.07, used captively in the manufacture of exempt final products, were entitled to duty concession under Notification No. 67/95-C.E.
Analysis: The notification extended the benefit to capital goods as defined in Rule 57Q, and the relevant heading covered goods under Heading Nos. 82.02 to 82.11. Tools and dies falling under Heading 82.07 were therefore capital goods for the purpose of the notification. The disqualification based on captive use for exempt final products applied to inputs, not to capital goods, and no such bar was shown in respect of capital goods under the notification.
Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was available, and the demand was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where captive goods qualify as capital goods under the applicable notification, exemption cannot be denied merely because they are used in the manufacture of fully exempt final products unless the notification itself creates such a bar.