Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after forfeiture of the fortnightly duty payment facility for default, the assessee could discharge duty through Cenvat credit instead of account current and whether the penalty required interference.
Analysis: The appellant had defaulted in payment of duty on due dates, whereupon the fortnightly payment facility stood forfeited for the relevant period. On a construction of Rule 49 read with Rule 173G of the Central Excise Rules, the duty during the period of default had to be paid only through account current, meaning the PLA, and not through Cenvat credit. The order also noted that the penalty had already been reduced by the appellate authority and found no reason to interfere further.
Conclusion: The duty demand and the penalty were upheld, and the assessee's plea to use Cenvat credit during the period of forfeiture was rejected.