Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suspension of the Customs House Agent licence under Regulation 21(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was justified in the facts of the case.
Analysis: The licence was suspended on account of misconduct attributed to an employee while handling an export consignment, but the material showed that the employee had acted without informing the appellants and that the appellants had not been examined by the investigating authority. The power under Regulation 21(2) is meant for immediate preventive action where delay would justify urgent suspension to safeguard revenue. Here, the suspension was ordered nearly 11 months after the incident, and the department could still proceed under Regulation 23 for enquiry and further action. These circumstances weighed against continued suspension of the licence.
Conclusion: The suspension under Regulation 21(2) was not justified and was set aside; the appellants succeeded on this issue.