Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal abated on the death of the sole appellant, when no legal representatives were brought on record within the prescribed time.
Analysis: The appellant had died, the notices sent to the appellant returned with the endorsement "deceased", and no legal heirs or legal representatives were brought on record. Rule 22 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules provides that an appeal abates on the death of a party unless an application for continuance is made by or against the successor-in-interest or legal representative within 60 days of the occurrence of the event. As the date of death was not known and no timely application from the legal representatives was filed, the oral request to set aside the impugned order could not be entertained.
Conclusion: The appeal abated and could not be proceeded with in the absence of substitution of the legal representatives.