Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's air-conditioners, affixed with MRP and cleared pursuant to negotiated rates and supply arrangements with DGS&D, were liable to be assessed under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 instead of Section 4 of that Act.
Analysis: The goods were notified for MRP-based assessment and were required to bear MRP under the packaged commodities regime. The arrangement with DGS&D governed only the price and contractual conditions; the actual supplies were made directly to the concerned departments in respect of individual air-conditioners. On the facts, the transaction was not a bulk sale to DGS&D and the reasoning in the cited contrary decision was inapplicable because that case involved bulk clearance and a different transactional structure.
Conclusion: Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applied, and assessment under Section 4 was not justified.