Tribunal Allows Conversion of Free Shipping Bills to DFRC, Citing Compliance with Customs Norms on Zirconium Silicate Imports.

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, allowing the conversion of free Shipping Bills to DFRC Shipping Bills. It found the Appeal maintainable under the Customs Act, noting compliance with Norms permitting Zirconium Silicate import. The Tribunal determined that proving forced filing of free Shipping Bills was unnecessary, and the Appellants provided sufficient evidence of Zirconium Silicate use in their exports.

---

---

Issues involved: Whether the Appellants are eligible to convert their free Shipping Bills into DFRC Shipping Bills.

Summary:
The Appellants, engaged in manufacturing and exporting sanitary-wares, sought to convert their free Shipping Bills to DFRC Shipping Bills. Customs Authorities required a Certificate listing the inputs used in the export product, which the Appellants did not provide initially. Circulars issued by the Board clarified conditions for conversion, including proof of used inputs and compliance with export scheme conditions. The Appellants applied for conversion, but their requests were rejected for not proving they were forced to file free Shipping Bills and for not verifying ingredient use as required by the DFRC Scheme.

The learned Advocate argued against the Commissioner's insistence on proving forced filing, citing relevant Circulars and a Tribunal case. He emphasized that the export of sanitary-wares occurred, and Zirconium Silicate was allowed for import against such exports. The Appellants had used Zirconium Silicate, supported by invoices and certificates. The Advocate contended that Central Excise verification was not mandatory for DFRC claims, citing a legal precedent.

The Departmental Representative argued against the Tribunal's jurisdiction and pointed out the Appellants' failure to prove ingredient use as required by Circulars. The Appellants later submitted the necessary documents.

The Tribunal found the Appeal maintainable under the Customs Act due to the Appellants seeking DFRC Scheme benefits. It noted the Appellants' export of sanitary-wares and compliance with Norms allowing Zirconium Silicate import. Circulars indicated conversion of free Shipping Bills without proving forced filing. Considering the evidence of Zirconium Silicate use, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the Appellants.

---