Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue could appropriate from the sanctioned refunds the amount of Modvat credit of Rs. 9,31,904 allowed by the Deputy Commissioner under an adjudication order that had attained finality, and whether Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000 automatically reversed that allowance.
Analysis: The amount of credit allowed by the Deputy Commissioner was never challenged by the Revenue and therefore had attained finality. Section 11 of the Central Excise Act permits recovery of sums due by deduction from money owing, but it does not authorise recovery of an amount merely because it was later covered by a validating provision when the original allowance has not been set aside. Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000 validated denial of credit for the relevant period, but it did not by itself annul the adjudication order allowing credit; separate recovery action in accordance with law was required. The Revenue could, therefore, appropriate only the amount lawfully recoverable on the basis of the existing adjudication and confirmed penalty.
Conclusion: The Revenue was not entitled to appropriate Rs. 9,31,904 from the sanctioned refunds. It could appropriate only Rs. 13,14,060 towards duty and Rs. 10,000 towards penalty. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.