CESTAT rules transit insurance excess not part of goods value for excise duty

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of M/s. HPL Chemicals Ltd. stating that the excess amount collected for transit insurance on Hydrazine should not be considered as part of the goods' value for excise duty purposes. The tribunal referred to the precedent established by the Apex Court in Baroda Electric Meters Ltd. The duty demand was set aside, and the appeals of the appellants were allowed.

---

---

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in the case of M/s. HPL Chemicals Ltd. regarding the collection of excess amount for transit insurance on Hydrazine. The tribunal found that the differential amount collected does not need to be treated as part of the goods' value for excise duty purposes, citing the precedent set by the Apex Court in Baroda Electric Meters Ltd. The tribunal set aside the duty demand and allowed the appeals of the appellants.

---