Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods manufactured on job work basis after 1-7-2000 were liable to valuation under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, or whether their assessable value continued to be governed by the settled job work valuation principle.
Analysis: Rule 8 applies only where excisable goods are not sold by the assessee but are used for consumption by him or on his behalf in the production or manufacture of other articles. Goods manufactured on job work basis for a buyer do not fall within that category, as they are not captively consumed by the assessee. The Board's circular clarified that the introduction of the 2000 Valuation Rules did not change the settled position laid down by the Supreme Court for job work goods. The applicable method therefore remained the cost of materials plus job charges, in line with the earlier valuation principle and the scheme of Rule 11 read with the established Supreme Court decisions.
Conclusion: Rule 8 was inapplicable to the impugned clearances and the goods were required to be valued on the accepted job work basis; the duty demand could not be sustained.