Customs assessable value excludes unrelated know-how and design fees unless tightly linked to the imported machinery and foreign production work.

Licence and know-how fees are includible in the assessable value of imported machinery only when they are sufficiently linked to the imported goods themselves, such as where the machinery cannot operate without the licence. On the facts noted, the fee related to manufacturing know-how for producing chloromethane, not to the machinery import, so it was excluded from assessable value. Engineering and design fees are includible only if the work was undertaken outside India and was necessary for producing the imported goods. As the detailed drawings were prepared in India and the record did not show the necessary foreign-origin work, that fee was also excluded. The additions to assessable value were therefore unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the licence and know-how fee payable under the collaboration agreement was includible in the assessable value of the imported machinery; (ii) Whether the engineering fee for design work was includible in the assessable value of the imported machinery.

Issue (i): Whether the licence and know-how fee payable under the collaboration agreement was includible in the assessable value of the imported machinery.

Analysis: The fee was found to relate to manufacturing know-how for producing chloromethane and not to the imported machinery itself. There was no condition that the imported machinery could not operate without a licence, and the machinery imports were not shown to be subject to the know-how arrangement. The authority relied on the principle applicable where an operating licence is integral to the imported plant, but that factual setting was absent here.

Conclusion: The licence and know-how fee was not required to be added to the assessable value, in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the engineering fee for design work was includible in the assessable value of the imported machinery.

Analysis: The relevant rule covered engineering, development, art work, design work, and plans and sketches only when such work was undertaken elsewhere than in India and was necessary for the production of the imported goods. The record did not show that the design work was undertaken outside India or that it was necessary for the production of the imported goods. The collaboration agreement contemplated only a basic engineering design package, while the detailed drawings were prepared in India by Indian consultants.

Conclusion: The engineering fee was not required to form part of the assessable value, in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The additions made towards licence and know-how fee as well as engineering fee to the value of the imported machinery were unsustainable, and the appeal succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Charges for know-how or engineering work are includible in customs assessable value only when they are sufficiently connected with the imported goods and, for engineering/design items, are shown to have been undertaken outside India and to be necessary for production of the imported goods.

---