Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clinker used within the factory for manufacture of cement cleared for earthquake relief was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 128/94.
Analysis: The exemption notification was read as extending to all excisable goods falling under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 when donated or purchased for relief and rehabilitation of earthquake-affected persons. The clinker was manufactured and utilised in the manufacture of cement that was itself cleared for the specified relief work, and the notification was construed not only strictly but also reasonably in light of its language and object. The fact that the relief-oriented exemption covered the cement also supported extension of the benefit to the clinker used in its manufacture.
Conclusion: The clinker qualified for exemption under Notification No. 128/94, and the demand was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the exemption benefit was extended to the clinker used in the manufacture of cement cleared for earthquake relief.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification intended for relief and rehabilitation must be construed strictly but reasonably according to its language and object, and it can extend to an intermediate product used in the manufacture of the exempted final product when the notification covers the goods and the relief purpose is satisfied.