Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether remission of duty on the shortage of molasses in steel tank No. 2 was allowable as a storage loss under Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The shortage found in the tank was less than 2% of production, but the claimant had to establish that the loss occurred in storage due to natural causes. The record showed stock verification by the dip method on more than one occasion, including by the appellants themselves, so the method of measurement could not be disowned. The differential shortage over a short winter period remained unexplained, and the appellants produced no cogent evidence to show evaporation, foam formation, or any other natural cause sufficient to constitute storage loss. The earlier order in the appellants' own case related to a different tank and period and did not assist them. The plea of violation of natural justice was also not available at that stage.
Conclusion: Remission of duty was not allowable, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A claim for remission of duty on alleged storage loss must be proved by cogent evidence that the shortage occurred in storage due to natural causes; a mere assertion of natural loss is insufficient.