Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat or Cenvat credit could be denied as time barred when the duty-paid input had been received before 1-4-2000, but credit was entered and taken later on the basis of a bill of entry.
Analysis: The input was not in dispute and the duty-paid nature of the goods was accepted. A bill of entry does not carry the same concept of date of issue as an invoice, and its filing date is not determinative of the physical receipt of the goods. The earlier time-limit under Rule 57G(5) governed the pre-1-3-2000 regime, but the substituted Rule 57AC(1) did not prescribe any time limit for availing credit. The transitional provision also permitted credit already earned before 1-4-2000 to be taken as Cenvat credit. The Board's clarification further supported the view that credit earned on receipt of inputs before 1-4-2000 could not be denied merely because it was taken later for some reason.
Conclusion: The denial of credit as time barred was unsustainable, and the credit was allowable to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty-paid inputs have been received and credit has been earned before the changeover to the Cenvat regime, credit cannot be denied merely because it was entered or availed later, if the governing substituted rule and transitional provision do not impose a time limit.