Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for abatement of tax under the Agreement for Avoidance of Double Taxation between India and Pakistan, agricultural loss incurred in Pakistan could be set off against Pakistan business income, or whether relief had to be computed on the business income alone.
Analysis: The Agreement governed taxation only of the incomes and categories of transactions specified in its Schedule, and its scheme was distinct from the statutory relief mechanism under section 49D of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Agricultural income arising in Pakistan did not fall within the scope of the Agreement for abatement, though such income or loss had to be taken into account in computing the assessee's total income under the Indian Act. Relief under section 49D(3) dealt separately with agricultural income taxed in Pakistan and did not apply where no Pakistani tax was shown on that income. The proper construction of article IV required separate consideration of the business income covered by the Agreement, without setting off the agricultural loss against it.
Conclusion: The agricultural loss in Pakistan could not be set off against the Pakistan business income for the purpose of abatement under the Agreement, and the assessee was entitled to relief on the entire Pakistan business income.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a double-taxation agreement provides abatement only for specified sources or categories of income, relief must be computed source-wise in accordance with the agreement, and income or loss from an excluded source cannot be brought into that computation merely because it forms part of the assessee's overall taxable income.