Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied and penalty and interest sustained merely because the invoices showed a wrong despatch source, although the inputs were received in the factory and their duty-paid nature and use in manufacture were not disputed.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the authenticity and co-relation of invoices issued by the dealer. The record showed that the appellants had received the inputs in their factory and had made payment to the dealer, while the only defect alleged was that the invoices mentioned despatch from Abohar though the material had allegedly originated elsewhere. The defect in the invoices was treated as attributable to the dealer, not to the appellants. Since the receipt of goods, their duty-paid character, and their use in manufacture were not disproved, the wrong description of the despatch source could not by itself justify denial of credit. The same reasoning applied to all three appeals because the facts and issue were materially identical.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible and the denial of credit, along with the connected penalty and interest, was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside in relation to all three appellants, and their appeals succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A mere defect or incorrect particulars in an invoice does not justify denial of Modvat credit where receipt of duty-paid inputs in the factory and their use in manufacture are established and remain undisputed.