Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed under the Central Excise law was excessive and liable to be scaled down by applying the principle underlying the first proviso to Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The appeal challenged only the penalty. The appellants had paid the duty before issuance of the show cause notice, and the Tribunal held that although the first proviso to Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not directly applicable to the earlier period in dispute, the principle embodied in it could still be applied. On that basis, the Tribunal found the penalty to be on the higher side and directed payment of a reduced amount.
Conclusion: The penalty was reduced to Rs. 75,000 and the appellant obtained partial relief.