Excisability of waste and scrap: sold manufacturing waste and used capital goods were dutiable, with overlapping penalties curtailed.

Waste sugar and waste paper generated during manufacture and sold in the market were treated as excisable, with waste sugar classified under Heading 1701.90 and waste paper under sub-heading 4702.90, because marketability was established by sale. Used gravura printing cylinders sold as waste and scrap were also held liable to duty under the Modvat withdrawal provisions applicable to capital goods. On penalties, simultaneous imposition under Section 11AC and Rule 9(1) was considered impermissible, and the penalty was reduced as excessive on the facts.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether waste sugar and waste paper generated during manufacture and sold by the assessee were excisable and classifiable to duty; (ii) whether duty was payable on gravura printing cylinders treated as used capital goods sold as waste and scrap; and (iii) whether penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 9(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be imposed simultaneously and, if so, what quantum was justified.

Issue (i): whether waste sugar and waste paper generated during manufacture and sold by the assessee were excisable and classifiable to duty.

Analysis: Waste sugar and waste paper arose in the course of manufacture while the assessee was availing Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Their sale was not disputed. Once the products were sold, marketability could not be denied. The waste sugar was held to fall under Heading 1701.90 and not under Heading 2301, because sugar remains covered by Chapter 17. Waste paper was also held classifiable under sub-heading 4702.90 as recovered waste and scrap paper.

Conclusion: Duty of excise on waste sugar and waste paper was payable and the assessee's challenge failed.

Issue (ii): whether duty was payable on gravura printing cylinders treated as used capital goods sold as waste and scrap.

Analysis: The assessee had availed Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on the cylinders and sent the used cylinders back to the supplier against adjustment in the price of new cylinders. The provisions of Rule 57S(2)(c) applied because capital goods sold as waste and scrap attract duty on such waste and scrap.

Conclusion: Duty on the gravura printing cylinders was correctly confirmed against the assessee.

Issue (iii): whether penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 9(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be imposed simultaneously and, if so, what quantum was justified.

Analysis: Simultaneous imposition of penalties under Section 11AC and Rule 9(1) was held impermissible. The penalties were also considered excessive on the facts, and a reduced penalty was found sufficient to meet the ends of justice.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to relief on penalty, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 25,000.

Final Conclusion: The duty demand on the disputed waste products and used capital goods was sustained, but the penalty component was substantially curtailed, resulting in only partial relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Waste or scrap emerging during manufacture and sold in the market is excisable and dutiable, and capital goods sold as waste and scrap attract duty under the relevant Modvat withdrawal provision; further, overlapping penalties cannot be cumulatively imposed where the statutory scheme does not permit it.

---