Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty on imported bulk liquid cargo was to be quantified on the basis of shore tank receipt, and whether the refund claims were required to be reconsidered on that basis.
Analysis: The dispute over assessment of bulk liquid cargo by reference to shore tank receipt was treated as settled by prior judicial decisions and by the Board's circular. The applicable instruction stated that quantification of bulk liquid cargo for assessment should be made on the basis of short tank receipt, namely dip measurement in shore tanks into which the cargo is pumped. In view of that position, the authority was required to determine the quantity on which duty could be charged by reference to the shore tank receipt at Hyderabad, after examining the relevant records and materials.
Conclusion: The assessment was to be made on the basis of shore tank receipt, and the refund applications were to be re-determined and quantified accordingly.