Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cement making machinery cleared in knocked down condition under a contract for supply of complete machinery was classifiable as complete machinery or merely as parts and components.
Analysis: The contract was for supply of the complete cement making machinery, and the machinery was dispatched in one or more consignments due to practical constraints. The decisive consideration was the character of the goods as cleared from the factory: if the parts sent together had the essential character of complete machinery in unassembled or disassembled condition, they could not be treated merely as parts. Mere separate packing or staggered dispatch did not alter the classification where the supply obligation was for the whole machinery. On that basis, the reasoning that the goods were only parts was not accepted.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable as complete cement making machinery and not as parts and components; the Revenue's appeal failed.