Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on finalisation of provisional assessment, the department could appropriate securities furnished for a subsequent period to discharge the duty liability of an earlier period, and whether refund had to be claimed by a separate application after final assessment.
Analysis: The assessee had furnished sufficient ad hoc cash deposits and securities for the period covered by the earlier finalisation order. The securities relating to the subsequent period could not be diverted to satisfy the liability determined for the earlier period when adequate securities for that earlier period were already available. Rule 9B(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 required adjustment of provisional duty against the duty finally assessed and provided that, if excess duty had been paid, the assessee became entitled to refund on finalisation itself. The rule did not contemplate a separate refund claim, and such a direction would only create avoidable multiplicity of proceedings. The reference to Section 11 of the Central Excises Act, 1944 did not justify appropriation from securities belonging to a different assessment period in the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The appropriation from the securities furnished for the subsequent period was not permissible, and refund followed finalisation of provisional assessment without a separate claim.