Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order detaining excisable goods, raw material, plant and machinery under Rule 230 of the Central Excise Rules is appealable and whether the appeal was liable to be decided on merits.
Analysis: The appeal against the order of detention had been rejected as not maintainable under Rule 230 of the Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal noted that the Allahabad High Court had held such an order to be appealable, and no contrary authority was shown. In light of that legal position, the impugned appellate order could not be sustained and the matter required reconsideration by the Commissioner (Appeals) on merits after hearing both sides.
Conclusion: The order dismissing the appeal as not maintainable was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh on merits.