Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessable value of 200 litre paint packs cleared from the factory could be determined with reference to the depot sale price of smaller repacked containers, and whether the duty demand, extended limitation, penalty and interest could be sustained on that basis.
Analysis: The goods were cleared from the factory in 200 litre bulk packs and were later repacked by job workers into smaller containers before sale from depots. The decisive factor was the form in which the goods were removed from the factory, not the later form in which they were sold after repacking. Repacking outside the factory was not shown to constitute manufacture for paints, and the depot could not be treated as the place of removal for the period before the relevant amendment. Even after the amendment, valuation could not be shifted to the smaller pack sale price when no sale price of the 200 litre packs at the factory gate or depot was available. The demand, extended period, penalty and interest were therefore unsustainable on the facts.
Conclusion: The valuation adopted by the Department was rejected, and the duty demand, penalty and interest were set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded because the assessable value had to be fixed on the basis of the goods as cleared from the factory, and the later repacking and depot sales could not be used to enhance valuation on the facts of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: Where excisable goods are cleared from the factory in one form and are later repacked outside the factory without such repacking amounting to manufacture, valuation must be based on the goods as removed from the factory and not on the sale price of the repacked goods sold from depots.