Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned iron and steel items, plates and sheets were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and whether credit was admissible for hot rolled and annealed stainless steel sheets used in fabrication of a reactor tank.
Analysis: The disputed items were used for repairing machines installed in the factory and used in manufacture of the final product. On that footing, the items qualified for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q when used as parts for repair of machinery. The stainless steel sheets used to fabricate a reactor tank stood on a different footing, because the reactor tank was not specified capital goods within the relevant table under Rule 57Q, and therefore the credit claimed on those sheets could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible for the impugned items used in repairing factory machinery, but credit on hot rolled and annealed stainless steel sheets used for fabrication of the reactor tank was not admissible.