Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the annual production capacity of the induction furnace unit was correctly determined at 3.2 MT and whether the sanctioned electricity load of 1300 KW could justify re-determination of the capacity at 2.6 MT.
Analysis: The capacity of the furnace had been admitted by the appellants in their correspondence and was also reflected in the supplier's invoice and the Chartered Engineer's certificate. Under Rule 3 of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, capacity is to be ascertained on the basis of the furnace capacity and other relevant material, and the sanctioned electricity load is not the statutory basis for fixing annual production capacity. Since the appellants did not dispute that the furnace capacity was 3.2 MT, the plea that lower sanctioned load reduced the assessable capacity was rejected. The request for remand for fresh measurement was also declined because no genuine dispute as to furnace capacity survived.
Conclusion: The determination of annual production capacity at 3.2 MT was upheld, and the assessee's challenge for fixation at 2.6 MT failed.