Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on the ground that the bill of entry stood in the name of a sister concern and was endorsed in favour of the appellant unit though the named concern was not shown as the appellant's head office or registered office.
Analysis: The denial of credit rested only on a technical objection to the endorsement of the bill of entry. The Tribunal noted that the departmental record itself treated the Ram Tirath Road concern as the head office in other proceedings, and there was no dispute that the entire consignment covered by the bill of entry had been received. In these circumstances, the objection was held to be too tenuous to defeat the credit claim, and the cited Board instructions were not treated as a basis to deny relief on the facts found.
Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was not justified and the assessee was entitled to the credit.