Modvat credit on inputs destroyed in fire did not attract penalty or interest when originally availed correctly.

Modvat credit taken on inputs was not rendered wrongful merely because the inputs were later destroyed in fire. Credit was valid when availed on receipt of goods intended for use in manufacture, and Rule 57-I(4) applied only where credit was taken wrongly through fraud, wilful misstatement, collusion, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade duty. The corresponding interest provision under Rule 57-I(5) required the same conditions. In the absence of such wrongful availment, and with no finding of failure to maintain credit balance to the Revenue's prejudice, the penalty and interest demands were unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty and interest were leviable in respect of Modvat credit taken on inputs that were subsequently destroyed in fire, where the credit amount itself was not contested.

Analysis: The credit was taken at the time of receipt of the inputs, when they were intended for use in or in relation to manufacture. Their subsequent destruction in fire did not make the original availment wrongful. Rule 57-I(4) applies only where credit is taken wrongly by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement, collusion, suppression of facts, or contravention of the rules with intent to evade duty. On the same footing, Rule 57-I(5) for interest applies only where those conditions exist. As the credit was not wrongly taken on such grounds, and there was no finding that the appellants had failed to maintain credit balance to the prejudice of Revenue, the penal and interest demands were unsustainable.

Conclusion: Penalty and interest were not leviable and were set aside in favour of the assessee.

---