TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal decision: Modvat credit denied, Excise duty upheld; penalties overturned</h1> <h3>GS. ENTERPRISES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR</h3> The Tribunal upheld the denial of Modvat credit and Central Excise duty demand, while overturning penalties imposed. The decision affirmed the ... Modvat - Valuation (Central Excise) Issues:The judgment involves the issue of Modvat credit eligibility for inputs used in the manufacture of disposable shaving razors and the correct valuation of the razors based on their Maximum Retail Price (MRP).Modvat Credit Eligibility:The appellant claimed Modvat credit for tucks of '7 O'clock blades' used in the manufacture of Gillette Presto International (GPI) razors. The Central Excise authorities disallowed the credit, stating that the blades were not inputs in the manufacture of the razors. The Tribunal agreed, citing Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules and a previous case law precedent. The tuck of blades was deemed a fully manufactured product and not a relevant input for the razor manufacturing process. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's reliance on Supreme Court decisions, emphasizing the incompatibility of the blades with the razors.Valuation of Razors:Regarding the valuation of the razors, the appellant contested the assessment based on an MRP of Rs. 10/- per piece, arguing that the razors were packed with blades and had a combined MRP of Rs. 23/-. The Tribunal upheld the valuation based on the MRP of Rs. 10/- per piece, as per the notification under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act. The razors were considered assessable at the MRP of Rs. 10/-, even when packed with blades, leading to the dismissal of the appellant's challenge to the valuation method.Penalty Imposition:The Tribunal found no evidence of mis-declaration, misstatement, suppression of facts, or fraud by the appellant. Therefore, the imposition of penalties was deemed unjustified and subsequently set aside.Conclusion:The Tribunal confirmed the denial of Modvat credit and the demand for Central Excise duty, while overturning the penalties imposed. The judgment upheld the decision of the Central Excise authorities on Modvat credit eligibility and the valuation of the razors based on their MRP.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
