Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported medical equipment constituted accessories of Cardiac and Vascular Angiography System including Digital Substraction Angiography so as to qualify for the benefit of Notification No. 17/01-Cus., dated 1-3-2001.
Analysis: The imported items were shown, through technical certificates, expert opinions from cardiologists, and the manufacturer's description, to be integral accessories of the angiography system. The Revenue did not produce any contrary technical material to disprove this position. In such circumstances, the goods were treated as accessories of the notified medical equipment and therefore eligible for the exemption.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the imported goods were held entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification.
Ratio Decidendi: Where technical and expert material establishes that imported goods are accessories of a notified medical equipment, and no contrary technical evidence is produced, the exemption available to accessories cannot be denied.