Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported porcelain tiles were classifiable as unglazed tiles under Heading 6907.90 or as glazed tiles under Heading 6908.90, and whether import without licence was permissible.
Analysis: The samples were drawn in the presence of the importer and tested by CRCL twice. Both reports indicated that the goods satisfied the characteristics of glazed tiles, including imperviousness and chemical resistance consistent with glazed tiles, and did not support the claim that they were unglazed tiles. The importer's own correspondence and manufacturing description also distinguished unglazed tiles as nearly vitrified and impermeable, unlike glazed tiles. The later reliance on DGFT classification under Heading 69141000.10 was treated as an afterthought, because the bill of entry had claimed classification under Heading 6907.90 and the imported goods were specifically covered by the glazed-tile heading.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified as glazed tiles under Heading 6908.90, import of which required a licence, which the importer did not possess. The challenge to confiscation and penalty failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where independent test reports and the importer's own description show that the goods answer the characteristics of glazed tiles, the goods must be classified accordingly and treated as restricted imports requiring a valid licence.