Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the place of removal was the factory gate or Delhi/New Delhi, and whether freight and insurance charges for transport from Delhi/New Delhi to the buyer's premises were includible in the assessable value.
Analysis: The goods were supplied under rate contracts showing delivery FOR station of despatch and free delivery within Delhi/New Delhi, with freight shown separately. The buyer was the consignee, and the invoices reflected the assessable value at Delhi/New Delhi. The goods were appropriated to the contract on inspection, approval, marking and delivery to the carrier, and property passed to the buyer at that stage. The taking of transit insurance by the seller did not, by itself, keep ownership with the seller, because the contract displaced the general rule that risk follows property. On these facts, the transfer of possession and sale occurred at Delhi/New Delhi within the meaning of the excise law.
Conclusion: The place of removal was Delhi/New Delhi, and freight and insurance charges for transport beyond that point were not includible in the assessable value.
Ratio Decidendi: Where property in goods passes to the buyer on appropriation and delivery to the carrier under the contract, the place where possession is transferred is the place of removal, and transit freight and insurance beyond that point are not part of the assessable value.