Exemption notifications and Larger Bench precedent govern workshop goods and remand for fresh consideration under factory-use limits.

Exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was said to require reconsideration in light of the binding Larger Bench ruling, so the earlier order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication by the jurisdictional Commissioner after hearing the assessees. For Notification No. 281/86-C.E., the benefit was treated as unavailable for goods manufactured in a workshop within the factory because they were not shown to be used for repairs or maintenance of machinery installed there. The note applies the Larger Bench view in TISCO Ltd. and records disposal of the appeals by remand on one issue and rejection on the other.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the eligibility of machinery items such as roller assembly, gauges, push trolleys and conveyors to exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. required fresh consideration in light of the Larger Bench decision. (ii) Whether the benefit of Notification No. 281/86-C.E. was available to goods manufactured in the workshop within the factory.

Issue (i): Eligibility under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was treated as governed by the Larger Bench ruling cited before the Tribunal. As the appeals involved several items and the parties agreed that the matter should be re-considered on that basis, the existing order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication by the jurisdictional Commissioner.

Conclusion: The issue was remanded for fresh decision in accordance with the Larger Bench ruling, after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing.

Issue (ii): The benefit of Notification No. 281/86-C.E. was considered unavailable where the goods were manufactured in a workshop within the factory but were not shown to be used for repairs or maintenance of machinery installed therein. The Larger Bench view in TISCO Ltd. was applied to deny the exemption.

Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 281/86-C.E. was held to be unavailable to the assessees on the facts stated.

Final Conclusion: The appeals were disposed of by remanding the matters on one exemption issue and rejecting the claim under the other notification.

Ratio Decidendi: Exemption notifications must be applied in accordance with binding Larger Bench precedent, and a workshop-based exemption is confined to goods used for repairs or maintenance of machinery installed in the factory.

---