Misdeclared import valuation upheld where contemporaneous imports supported rejection of declared invoice value and demurrage claim failed

Misdeclared imports may lose transaction-value protection where examination shows the goods are not as declared and contemporaneous import data supports a higher assessable value. Acrylic thread waste containing a substantial quantity of fibre was treated as inadequately described, so the declared invoice price was rejected and the department's valuation based on comparable imports was upheld. A claim for demurrage adjustment was also rejected because no supporting evidence was produced. The order confirming duty demand and confiscation was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared invoice value of imported goods could be rejected and the assessable value enhanced on the basis of contemporaneous imports when the goods were misdeclared as waste but contained a substantial quantity of fibre; and whether the plea for adjustment of demurrage could be accepted.

Issue: Whether the declared invoice value of imported goods could be rejected and the assessable value enhanced on the basis of contemporaneous imports when the goods were misdeclared as waste but contained a substantial quantity of fibre.

Analysis: The goods were declared as acrylic thread waste, but examination revealed a considerable proportion of acrylic fibre. In such circumstances, the declared invoice price could not be treated as the transaction value. The value was also supported by contemporaneous import invoices of the same period, and the adoption of the lowest comparable price for Italian-origin fibre was not found to be infirm.

Conclusion: The declared value was correctly rejected and the enhancement of value was upheld, in favour of Revenue.

Issue: Whether the plea for adjustment of demurrage could be accepted.

Analysis: No evidence was produced to substantiate the claim for demurrage.

Conclusion: The plea for demurrage was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The order confirming duty demand and confiscation was sustained, and the appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are misdeclared and the evidence of contemporaneous imports supports the valuation adopted by the department, the declared invoice value need not be accepted as transaction value.

---