Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the royalty and licence fees paid for imported film prints and trailers were includible in the assessable value under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, and whether any exclusion could be allowed for alleged distribution or reproduction rights charges.
Analysis: The imported goods could not be put to any use without the accompanying rights to reproduce and distribute them, and the payment shown in the invoice was linked to the import under the distribution agreement. The interpretative note excluding payments for reproduction or distribution rights applies only where such payments are not a condition of sale for export to the country of importation. The claimed split-up between royalty and distribution charges was not substantiated by reliable evidence, and the burden to prove exclusion rested on the appellants. In the absence of a proved breakup, the full amount described in the invoice was treated as part of the import value.
Conclusion: The royalty charges were held includible in the assessable value, and the claimed exclusion was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where royalty or licence payments are a condition of the import transaction and no reliable breakup is proved, such charges form part of the customs assessable value under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.