Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether gears and shafts manufactured for and used solely and principally in power tillers were classifiable under Heading 84.83 or under Heading 84.32/8424.91.
Analysis: The classification of parts in Section XVI is governed by the relevant section notes. The Tribunal distinguished authorities dealing with parts and accessories under Section XVII because the rules applicable there are different and those decisions did not assist in classifying the present goods. The heading notes to 84.32 cover agricultural machines and their parts, but power tillers themselves do not fall under 84.24 and that heading could not support the appellant's claim. By contrast, Heading 84.83 covers mechanical parts used in transmission of power and internal machine parts used to transmit power within the machine. On a plain reading of the heading notes, gears and shafts remain within Heading 84.83 even if specifically designed and exclusively used in power tillers.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Heading 84.83, and the appellant's challenge to that classification failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the tariff heading expressly covers transmission parts, their special design or exclusive use in a particular machine does not exclude them from that heading unless the tariff scheme specifically provides otherwise.