Modvat credit and invoice validity required fresh examination after Board clarification on sale and purchase under excise law.

Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the Department alleged that the invoices were issued without a sale transaction. The Tribunal noted the Board's clarification on the meaning of sale and purchase under the Central Excise Act and the earlier view that the sale element was not ative for such transactions. The issue was therefore required to be re-examined by the original authority in light of that clarification, and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration with a speaking order after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied merely because the invoices were issued in a transaction where the Department alleged that no sale was involved, and whether the matter required de novo reconsideration in the light of the Board's clarification.

Analysis: The denial of credit rested on the view that the invoice must evidence a sale transaction for the purposes of the relevant Modvat notifications. The Tribunal noted the Board's circular clarifying the meaning of sale and purchase under Section 2(h) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the earlier Tribunal view that the sale element was not determinative in the type of transactions under consideration. Following that clarification and the earlier decision, the question whether the invoices were invalid solely for want of a sale transaction required fresh examination by the original authority.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the original authority for de novo consideration and passing of a speaking order after affording the appellants a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

---