2001 (6) TMI 127 - AT - Customs

Equipment Coating Paints Eligible for Customs Exemption, Special Tools Not: Tribunal Decision

The Tribunal held that paints were eligible for Customs duty exemption under Notification No. 111/95-Cus as they were essential for coating equipment ... Paints - Tools Issues:Eligibility of paints for Customs duty exemption under Notification No. 111/95-Cus.Eligibility of special tools for Customs duty exemption under Notification No. 111/95-Cus.Eligibility of Paints:The appeal concerned the eligibility of paints for Customs duty exemption under Notification No. 111/95-Cus. The paints were imported along with various items forming the power plant in Semi Knocked Down (SKD) condition. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) held that the paints were not covered by the exemption notification. The appellant argued that paints were essential for manufacturing the machine and should be considered as a component of the imported goods. The Tribunal analyzed technical specifications and concluded that the paints were essential for coating the equipment after assembly, forming an integral part of the equipment's value. Therefore, the paints were deemed eligible for the benefit of the Customs duty exemption under the notification.Eligibility of Special Tools:The issue of special tools' eligibility for Customs duty exemption under Notification No. 111/95-Cus was also examined. The special tools were for operating the power plant after assembly, not for its assembly or installation. The appellants admitted that these tools were not capital goods. The Tribunal considered the Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963, which apply to accessories and spare parts of imported articles. However, the special tools were not considered spare parts, and separate charges were shown for them in the invoices. The Tribunal found that the special tools were not covered by the exemption notification and dismissed the appeal concerning their eligibility.Interest on Duty:Regarding interest on duty, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) had denied a refund of interest as there was no question of duty refund. Since the Tribunal allowed the appeal for paints but dismissed it for special tools, the question of interest refund needed re-examination by the jurisdictional authorities. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of the interest issue in light of the legal provisions applicable during the relevant time. Ultimately, the appeal was partly allowed for paints and dismissed for special tools, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.