Omitted tax credit rules and absence of a saving clause caused pending proceedings and appeals to lapse.

Unconditional omission of the Modvat and money credit rules without a saving clause caused pending proceedings and appeals under those rules to lapse. The Tribunal applied the principle that, where a rule is omitted outright and no specific saving provision preserves existing actions, the provision is treated as obliterated from the statute book for pending matters. It further stated that Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 does not by itself preserve proceedings on repeal or omission of a rule in the absence of express saving language. As a result, the original adjudication proceedings and the appeal could not survive.

---

---

Issues: Whether appeals arising from proceedings initiated under the omitted Modvat and money credit rules remained maintainable after the relevant rules were deleted without a saving clause.

Analysis: The Tribunal held that the money credit provisions under Rule 57K and the Modvat/capital goods provisions under Rules 57A to 57V stood omitted or replaced without any effective saving clause for pending proceedings. It applied the principle that, where a rule is unconditionally omitted and no saving provision preserves pending actions, the omission obliterates the provision from the statute book and all proceedings initiated under it come to an end. The Tribunal further held that Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 does not extend to the repeal or omission of a rule in the absence of a specific saving provision, and therefore neither the original adjudication proceedings nor the appeal could survive.

Conclusion: The appeals were not maintainable and could not proceed on merits.

Final Conclusion: Proceedings initiated under the omitted rules lapsed in the absence of a saving clause, leaving no surviving appealable controversy before the Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi: When a rule is unconditionally omitted without a saving clause, pending proceedings and appeals initiated under that rule lapse, and Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 does not by itself preserve them.

---