Small-scale industry exemption turns on whether the mark belongs to another person and shows a barred trade connection.

A small-scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-CE cannot be denied merely because goods bear a mark or name. The decisive question is whether the mark is the brand or trade name of another person so as to indicate a barred trade connection. On the facts, the mark "Meet National" was not shown to be another person's registered trade name, and it did not by itself establish the prohibited connection. The Tribunal therefore held that the assessee remained eligible for the exemption and the denial was unsustainable, with consequential relief available according to law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 175/86-CE despite using the mark "Meet National" on its goods, and whether such use by itself disentitled the assessee from the small-scale industry exemption.

Analysis: The mark "Meet National" was held not to be a registered trade name of any other person, and the Tribunal followed its earlier view that the exemption under Notification No. 175/86-CE cannot be denied merely because the goods bear a mark that does not, by itself, establish a trade connection with another brand owner. The decisive consideration was whether the mark indicated such a relationship as to attract the bar in the notification; on the facts found, it did not.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 175/86-CE, and the denial of exemption was unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee retained eligibility for the claimed exemption, with consequential relief available according to law.

Ratio Decidendi: A small-scale industry exemption cannot be denied merely because the goods bear a mark or name unless that mark is shown to be the brand or trade name of another person so as to indicate a trade connection barred by the notification.

---