Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was disentitled to exemption under Notification No. 1/93 on the ground that the brand name assignment became effective only from the date of registration, or whether the assignment operated from the date fixed in the deed between the parties.
Analysis: Section 2(i)(a) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 recognises assignment as an act done in writing by the parties concerned, so the assignment is rooted in the consensual deed itself. Registration only records the assignment already made under the deed and does not postpone its operative date. For a registered trade mark, Section 37 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 permits assignment with or without goodwill, and the effective date is therefore the date stipulated in the agreement rather than the later date of registration certificate.
Conclusion: The assignment in favour of the assessee became effective from 16-8-1993, and the contrary view was rejected. The demand based on denial of exemption could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded.