Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a refund claim arising from finalisation of a provisional customs assessment is governed by the limitation under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, and whether the doctrine of unjust enrichment applies to such refund.
Analysis: The assessment was provisional and was later finalised by the Department, so the refund claim arose only as a consequence of such finalisation. The Tribunal applied the principle laid down in the Supreme Court decision in Mafatlal Industries, under which recoveries or refunds arising from adjustment on final assessment are not governed by the ordinary refund limitation provisions in the same manner as independent refund claims. The Tribunal also followed its earlier decisions holding that, where refund flows directly from finalisation of assessment, the bar of unjust enrichment is not attracted in the same way as in a independent refund proceeding.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not hit by limitation and was not barred by unjust enrichment; the assessee was entitled to the refund.
Ratio Decidendi: A refund arising directly from finalisation of a provisional assessment is not to be treated as an independent refund claim for the ordinary limitation and unjust enrichment bars applicable to standalone refund applications.