Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether data recorded on tapes, imported without the programme for manipulation, qualified as "Information Technology Software" under Notification No. 20/99-Cus. and was eligible for exemption.
Analysis: The relevant explanation in Notification No. 20/99-Cus. defined Information Technology Software broadly as any representation of instructions, data, sound or image recorded in a machine readable form. Compared with Notification No. 23/98-Cus., the later notification omitted the restrictive exclusion relating to software required for the operation of a specific machine. On a plain reading, the amended wording enlarged the scope of the exemption and did not permit the restriction applied by the lower authority. The imported goods were admittedly data recorded on tapes and fell within the wider description in the later notification.
Conclusion: The goods were entitled to the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 20/99-Cus., and the contrary view of the Commissioner (Appeals) could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification widens the defined coverage of software by deleting a prior exclusion, the later notification must be applied according to its plain language and the benefit cannot be denied by importing limitations from the earlier notification.