Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Customs could deny clearance under Notification No. 204/92-Cus. on the ground that the advance licence lacked value restrictions and was therefore invalid.
Analysis: The licence was issued by the competent licensing authority and indicated no value restriction. If the department considered the licence to have been wrongly issued or to require restrictions, the proper course was action under the Foreign Trade regulatory framework. In the absence of such action, Customs could not question the validity of the licence or deny the import benefit merely on the basis of its own view of the licence conditions. The department's reliance on a different reading of the sensitive-item list and the handbook was therefore not accepted.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee; Customs could not reject the imports on the ground urged.