Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund arising from assessments made on a provisional basis was governed by the limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, or whether the assessee was entitled to credit or adjustment on finalisation of assessment under the relevant Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The assessment scheme under Rule 173F, read with Rules 173B, 173C, 173CC, 173I and Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, contemplated provisional determination and later finalisation by the proper officer. In that framework, excess duty paid could be taken in credit after final assessment, and a separate refund application was not required for amounts adjustable under the rule. The limitation provision in Section 11B was held not to govern such credit or adjustment until the assessment was finally settled. The later amendment brought by Notification No. 38/96 was noted as altering the position prospectively.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not time barred on the facts of provisional assessment, and the matter was rightly remitted to ascertain the date of finalisation and re-determine refund entitlement. The finding was in favour of the assessee.