Tribunal procedural powers to enforce compliance by rejecting an inadequate report and directing personal appearance with records

A Tribunal may enforce compliance with its procedural directions by rejecting an inadequate report filed instead of a required affidavit and by requiring the officer concerned to appear personally with the record. Where the replacement report does not explain continued non-compliance with earlier directions, it is not treated as satisfactory compliance. The procedural powers under the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 and Section 35-D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 were used to secure a personal explanation and production of records from the Assistant Commissioner.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Assistant Commissioner's report satisfied the Tribunal's direction for filing an affidavit and whether the Tribunal could direct the officer to appear personally and produce the record.

Analysis: The report filed in place of the required affidavit was found inadequate and did not explain the continued non-compliance with the Tribunal's earlier directions. The Tribunal relied on its procedural powers under the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 and Section 35-D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to enforce compliance and secure a personal explanation from the officer concerned.

Conclusion: The report was not accepted, and the Assistant Commissioner was directed to appear personally before the Tribunal with the record.

---