Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in proceedings initiated under Section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, an assessee whose return showed no income and only a loss could require that loss to be determined, recorded, and carried forward under Section 24.
Analysis: The statutory scheme permitted loss relief only where a loss could be set off against income, profits, or gains, and any unabsorbed balance could be carried forward only if it could not be wholly set off in the year concerned. The Court held that where there was no income at all under any head, Section 24(1) did not come into operation, and a loss arising from the same business head could not be brought within Section 24(1) because such deduction belonged, if at all, to Section 10. Since the loss could not be set off under Section 24(1), there was no basis to carry it forward under Section 24(2), and the question of recording or computing the loss in the reassessment proceedings became irrelevant.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to have the loss determined or carried forward in the Section 34 proceedings, and the answer to the referred question was against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A loss can be carried forward under Section 24(2) only if it is one that can first be brought within Section 24(1) for set-off against income, profits, or gains in the relevant year; where no taxable income exists under any head, no such set-off arises and the loss need not be recorded in reassessment proceedings.