Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for computing additional income-tax on excess dividend, the expression "at the rate applicable to the total income of the company" meant the rate prescribed generally by the Finance Act or the rate actually applied after taking into account the rebate granted under the Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950.
Analysis: The relevant charging scheme under the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the First Schedule to the Finance Act required the Court to read the disputed words in their statutory context. The expression "rate applicable" was held to refer to the rate that was in fact applied to the company's total income for the relevant year, not merely the abstract rate prescribed in the Schedule. The explanation to the proviso itself contemplated reduction of the prescribed rate by the rebate, showing that the statutory phrase could not be confined to the unreduced general rate. The same phrase had to bear one meaning throughout the clause, and the method for computing "tax actually borne" supported inclusion of the rebate allowed under the Concessions Order.
Conclusion: The expression "at the rate applicable to the total income of the company" means the rate actually applied in the particular case after giving effect to the rebate.